unless they are referenced in the acuatl OSP. Implementers only has what Microsoft themselves promise. If Microsoft doesn't fulfill its obligations versus Ecma or ISO it is only an issue between Microsoft and ISO or Ecma. The implementers are out in the cold.Oliver,Further problems. Even if Microsoft were to add such language as you post here, it will still not get close to what Sun has for ODF. Sun has, since they refer to the rules of OASIS, already committed themselves for obligations given *even* if they no longer participate. The rules of OASIS, se section 11, states so and Sun by referring to those rules in their Patent Statement, are bound by them.If Sun leaves, and no longer participate, their obligations of already given promises, will continue into future versions of ODF. This is not the case for Microsoft. If Microsoft leaves, patent promises given for already existing features in OOXLM will no longer be covered in future versions. ISO and Ecma will have to then toss out all such sections of the standard. This is not the case for ODF and Sun.Microsoft should thus either refer to some rules, if any exists, of ISO and Ecma that has such commitment or insert it in their own OSP. Otherwise Microsoft can basically put forward a veto on future changes, threatening to leave. Not a healthy situation.

JoBOfr , hjypfbeedswy, [link=http://dyakrrpnxfui.com/]dyakrrpnxfui[/link], http://wmzerebfnx...